Showing posts with label propaganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label propaganda. Show all posts

Saturday, November 2, 2013

No more spying on citizens who are not suspected of a crime - Obama in 2007

Obama in 2007: No more spying on citizens who are not suspected of a crime


QUOTE; Created by President Truman in 1952, during the Korean War, the NSA is charged with protecting the United States from foreign security threats. The agency was considered so secret that for years the government refused to even confirm its existence. Government insiders used to joke that NSA stood for "No Such Agency."

QUOTE; PRISM is a clandestine mass electronic surveillance program operated by the United States National Security Agency (NSA) since 2007. (BEFORE OBAMA TOOK OFFICE)…

QUOTE; As the Nicene Church was establishing its official doctrines and replacing biblical Judaism with Catholicism ("Universalism"), it is a well known and easily established fact that they incorporated the teachings of many different religious systems. These early "church fathers" were attempting to establish a new and global political and religious authority in order to control every aspect of human life. (LONG BEFORE GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA WAS A WAKE-UP CALL)
 


Monday, February 27, 2012

Act of Valor - Act of Anti-Semitism

                     Lynchage de Gaddafi - Lynching of Gaddafi 

Finally, Gaddafi has not been hanged but executed in 
circumstances that remain unclear. The shooter deserves the 
congratulations of Western governments: by disappearing 
suddenly, and without the semblance of a trial, the former Libyan leader wins 
in the tomb 42 years of state secrets. Details-for example-its 
collaboration with oil companies Anglo-Saxon or his commitment 
in the forced-called "war against terrorism" will remain 
opaque. The man whom the President
as the heir of pan-Arabism will no longer reveal what he
saw and understood, for nearly half a century, in geopolitical terms. As for
the symbolism of its disposal, some want to use the already
intimidate other neighbors in the region. A powerful and influential think-tank
American, the href = "http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations">Council on
Foreign Relations
 , was quick to state its position, very
usually followed with transatlantic elites: "It is
vital that the international community will now continue to play a role of
support in Libya. This will produce a positive demonstration, particularly 
in countries like Syria and Yemen. "

Act of Valor = Act of Anti-Semitism


Unfortunately, an otherwise decent movie was ruined by gratuitous anti-semitism of the new left Jeremiah Wright-David Duke hybrid variety.
The lead bad guy is a Russian speaking Jew (oddly named Christo) in the Ukraine whose specialty is smuggling drugs from Mexico into the into the US (at least he did not confess to developing the AIDS virus to target blacks). The scene introducing him shows him as a hook-nosed, snaggle-toothed, import from a Goebbels poster speaking with a New York Jewish accent. Late in the film, it is gratuitously announced, by an American interrogator, that Christo is Jewish (more below).
The other lead bad guy is Christo's childhood friend (unclear whether he also was Jewish) who is now a Chechen terrorist leader (having adopted the nomme de guerre "Abu Shamal"). Abu Shamal is purported to be a convert to Islam (although it is unclear whether he is sincere).
The main actual Muslim characters in the film are innocent looking Filipinos (stereotypes of people intimidated/duped into their roles rather than more active intellectual participants) who are used by Abu Shamal to smuggle suicide bomb vests into the US via Christo's smuggling routes. Abu Shamal conspicuously does not join in their Islamic prayers, thus further drawing his conversion into doubt (originally hinted at by Christo mockingly addressing him by his Russian name).
In the scene where the interrogator notes Christo's Jewishness relative to the Muslim nature of Chechen terrorists, Christo goes into an odd soliloquy about some sort of yin-yang relationship with Abu Shamal since their childhood in which America is now in the middle. Because this dates back to their childhood, it must be Christo's Jewishness rather than his friend's Islam that is the driver. Christo also appears to not well hold his Russian accent, sounding more and more New Yorker during the course of the interrogation. Again, this seems in line with much modern anti-Semitism wherein Islamic terrorism is asserted as encouraged by Jews.
Christo's Jewishness added nothing to the film. If anything its gratuitous addition only created confusion.  source:


Don’t give money to blood libel movies like this that seek to turn America against the Jews using patriotism, the flag, and the Navy SEALs. This flick clearly earns its rating of . . .
FOUR GOEBBELS PLUS A BIN LADEN AND AN ARAFAT
plus.jpgbinladensmallerplus.jpgtinyarafat
Watch the trailer . . .


Lynching of Gaddafi

Blackout. If the circumstances of the death of Muammar
Gaddafi raise questions, most Western media have
already watered down the brutality of his capture.Umma you to 
discover those other videos that contradict the heroic image-to-France for 
"revolutionary" Libyan.
Saddam Hussein had disappeared in time: a few minutes 
after his hanging, one witness at the scene was in possession of a camera 
cell phone. Five years later, the spread of this technology
has facilitated the
images showing the capture and 
death of Muammar Gaddafi. 



Gaddafi last moments - Últimos Momentos Kadafi





A sequence has not yet received the media attention: a 
period of 2 minutes and 28 seconds, this video, captured by one of the insurgents, 
reveals the barbarity of the men who held the deposed leader. The bloodied face, 
Muammar Gaddafi, receiving punches, seems to implore - a gesture of 
the hand-an illusory clemency.
Another sequence, just unveiled, also testifies to the violence of their capture. An American site based in Boston, The Global Post , obtained the exclusive first images of the detention of Muammar Gaddafi.
While most executives involved in the coalition of 
NATO refrained from publicly expressing any form of triumphalism, an 
exception is already talking about her on the Internet: href = "http://youtu.be/gwj-qQntXNo"> surprised by the news, Hillary 
Clinton, U.S. Secretary of State, was registered to his visibly- 
blind-being will rejoice over the death of Qaddafi. Paraphrasing href = "http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veni, _vidi, _vici"> about Julius
Caesar, she enthuses: "We came, we saw, he died! "
If the head of American diplomacy wanted - awkwardly - to confirm the thesis of a superpower that can be seen as 
the new Roman Empire, it could hardly do better. The related idea according
to which the U.S. "imperialists"  would not hesitate
to deny its partners also less docile by calling them
suddenly "barbarians" would not have displeased Muammar
Gaddafi. In 2008, at the summit of the League
Arab
 , the Libyan head of state warned his counterparts in the Maghreb
and the Middle East against a future threat: the American betrayal.
Having discussed the issue
and the Palestinian plight of Saddam Hussein-the former U.S. ally
who became their worst enemy, Muammar Gaddafi launched a prediction under the
amused gaze of Bashar al-Assad and Abdelaziz Bouteflika: "How an
Arab president, a member of the Arab League did could well be
hanged? ... Any of you could be next. All
done! ... One day, America could hang us! ".

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Hitler reviews troops-Patricia McAllister Jew Hater Exposed SSDD



Hitler reviews troops in Warsaw, 5 October 1939

Thursday, October 5, 1939 to Thursday, October 20, 2011
72 years and 15 days
864 months
26,313 days
26,313 days can be converted to one of these units:
  • 2,273,443,200 seconds
  • 37,890,720 minutes
  • 631,512 hours
  • 3759 weeks
    To this in 2011



ANY QUESTIONS?
Recently, at an #OWS Bolshevik party, someone asked this Jew hater, Patricia McAllister what her opinion was regarding this country. 
Her reply h/t, Donna:
-
So, why do I think she should not have been released? 
-
   In 2010, in my own hometown, there is a radio commentator named Steve Blair. He was fired from his radio job and  his full time job for saying that he did not like the WORD:  diversity.   Just a word, and all of the Communists in town had this mans life turned upside down.  What did he say that was wrong?  Well, he went against the ‘liberal’ Bible of Destroy America when he said he did not like a WORD; Diversity.  This type firing is un Constitutional
-
McAllisters ‘release’ is also un Constitutional. The ‘liberal’ bible is not the Constitution, and in my opinion, the people that are against the Constitution are the ones that should be ‘thrown out of the country’, Jew AND Non-Jew.  I cannot be ‘for’ Steve Blair, and against this Jew hater, McAllister.

  What do I think about McAllisters statements?  I believe that McAllister is unbalanced, and totally unfocused. She is brainwashed by the Black Panther/Black power mantra, as well.  It can be seen on her website. 

McAllisters website is here (scroll through):

Get Off Wall Street

-
  “Zionists” are not in control of  Wall Street.   Zionists are usually Christians, way more than Jews.  They believe that Jesus is the cornerstone of Zion.  This is why most Christians are Zionists.  I realize that most people dont  know there is a politicial movement called “Zionism”.    But, most of us are not into the political aspect of this. I am not.  I am only led by scriptures.  The scriptures tell me what Zion is.    I dont care WHO ‘invented’ Zionism.  To me, it is an everlasting thing. I own no stocks in banks, shares, etc. I am not a Crony. I am not the problem.  Anti-Americans are. Like OWS, who ARE the problem. But, that is how brainwashed McAllister is.  And btw: We dont owe McAllister jack sh*t.  she is all about ‘reparations.’   I specifically dont owe her, being my father is a son of the American Revolution and Iroquois/Seneca.
Ms McAllister has a picture on her website:
-
-
This picture depicts a BOLSHEVIK/Communist-Jew fighting for ‘equal rights’ for blacks. (Yes, this is on her website, from a Nazi site)  The character that is depicted is a Communist -Jew (Most of whom do not wear yarmulke’s). 
  A Zionist Jew is usually NOT a Communist.  As well as Zionist-Christians are NOT Communists.  And, frankly, I am tired of being ranked up with people that are destroyers and COMMUNIST Jews play a part in this, sadly.
  So, in my opinion, this Jew hater, McAllister deserved ‘equal time’ from a person who knows the difference, like David Horowitz, who could explain just how bad affirmative action has been for her people. How she is WITH those that she hates. Just like the Nazis have aligned themselves with Communists.  Horowitz is an X-Commie, and that is who should be allowed to debate McAllister.

-
Bolshevik/Marxist/Liberal/Progressives (Jews AND Non-Jews) are the ones that are screwing this nation up.  McAllister is WITH them.  So, imo, a person like this should not be released for being stupid.  She should be able to dissent, but equal time and debate should be granted.

http://themadjewess.com/2011/10/19/the-reason-i-dont-agree-with-the-firing-of-jew-hater-patricia-mcallister-lausdunconstitutional/

Ms. McAllister and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,

In Poland... Hitler tours the conquered capital of Warsaw, reviewing the victory parade, before returning to Berlin. Meanwhile, German forces continue mopping up operations against Polish troops still at large between the Vistula and Bug rivers.
In Germany... The Nazi anti-Semitic weekly, Der Sturmer, publishes a "Hymm of Hate" calling England the "curse of the world."
In Moscow... The Soviets continue their moves to strengthen their position in the Baltic by asking the Finnish government for new talks on altering their boundaries. Meanwhile, a Soviet-Latvian Pact is signed, giving the USSR the use of sea and air bases in Latvia. This pact is the second in a series designed to ensure Soviet control of the Baltic.
In the North Atlantic... Eight British and French hunting groups are formed to hunt for the Graf Spee. At this stage the British and the French can afford to divert considerable forces to such a task. Meanwhile, the German pocket battleship Deutschland sinks the SS Stonegate.
"Whoever had the occasion to be an eye-witness during the slaughtering of animals or to see at least a truthful film on the slaughtering-will never forget this horrible experience. It is atrocious. And unwillingly, he is reminded of the crimes which the Jews have committed for centuries on men. He will be reminded of the ritual murder.
History points out hundreds of cases in which non-Jewish children were tortured to death. They also were given the same incision through the throat as is found on slaughtered animals. They also were slowly bled to death while fully conscious"
Der Stürmer, July 1938
Over time Der Stürmer's circulation grew and it was distributed to any country with a large German population, including: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, and the United States, among others.
But by 1938 the rhetoric began to change. Rather than the usual rants against the evils of the Jews, the paper began to call for the annihilation of the Jewish race. Between 1938 and 1941 the Nuremberg trials proved that twenty-three individual articles were printed in Der Stürmer where the key focus was the urging of the physical destruction of Jews as a vermin and pestilence.
One article from May, 1939 stated:
"A punitive expedition must come against the Jews in Russia. A punitive expedition which will provide the same fate for them that every murderer and criminal must expect. Death sentence and execution. The Jews in Russia must be killed. They must be exterminated root and branch."
As the war progressed successfully on both fronts, Streicher stepped up his efforts to incite anti-Jewish hatred through his speeches and his writings. Over the next few years between August, 1941 and September, 1944, he personally authored 12 articles demanding the annihilation and extermination of the Jewish race in unequivocal terms.
One article written personally by Streicher dated 25th December, 1941 stated:

"If the danger of the reproduction of that curse of God in the Jewish blood is to finally come to an end, then there is only one way-the extermination of that people whose father is the devil."
On March 19, 1942 he also stated:
"There were two ways which might have led to a liberation of Europe from the Jews: Expulsion or extermination! Both methods have been tried in the course of the centuries, but they were never carried to a conclusion.... The teaching of Christianity has stood in the way of a radical solution of the Jewish problem in Europe...

Fate has decreed that it was finally left to the 20th century to see the total solution of the Jewish problem. Just how this solution will be achieved has been made known to the European nations and to entire non-Jewish humanity in a proclamation read out by the Führer of the German people on the 24th February 1942."
(quoting Adolf Hitler):

The Protocols Come to America

At the turn of the century, the Russian Czar’s secret police forged a document, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which purported to outline a plan for Jewish world domination. The Russians claimed that the radical Jewish intelligentsia gathered in 1897 at the First Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland wrote the Protocols. The document “showed” how a Jewish cabal was fomenting terror, causing famine and promoting war. Publication of the Protocols sparked anti-Jewish pogroms in Kiev and Kishineff.
While the Protocols were whispered about in anti-Semitic circles in the United States, they did not reach American shores in English translation until 1917. A Russian monarchist émigré, Boris Brasol, translated the Protocols into English and passed a copy to the State Department, hoping to persuade the United States government to withhold recognition of the Soviet regime. He was convinced that the Bolsheviks were in the pay of American Jewish bankers of German background -- Jacob Schiff and Felix Warburg in particular – who had financed the Czar's overthrow to advance German interests in World War I.
An American Army Intelligence officer in Brooklyn, Harris Ayres Houghton, MD, obtained Brasol’s translation of the Protocols and became convinced of their authenticity. An ardent anti-Semite and anticommunist, Houghton had the authority to act on his fantasies. According to historian Robert Singerman, writing in the journal of the American Jewish Historical Society,* Houghton “ordered one of his subordinates ‘to investigate any Jew as long as he was prominent’” for signs of subversion. In 1918, Houghton passed a copy of the Protocols to Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, chair of a government committee investigating a scandal in American wartime aircraft manufacture. Houghton was certain that “Jewish International Bankers” had caused the manufacturing problems, but Justice Hughes scoffed at the idea and denied the authenticity of the Protocols.
At first, the American Jewish community made no formal response to the typescript versions of the Protocols in circulation. They believed it best not to give them publicity. In 1920, however, a version was published in England and both Brasol and Houghton planned to bring out annotated versions in the United States. Brasol found a respectable company named Small, Maynard to publish his version. Putnam and Son publishers agreed to publish Houghton’s.
When the American Jewish Committee learned of Putnam’s plans, its president, Louis Marshall, contacted General George H. Putnam directly to discuss the publication project. Putnam defended it on the grounds of free speech, but Marshall countered that free speech is only protected if its is not libelous. Since there was ample proof that the Protocols were forgeries written to stir up violence against Jews, it would be irresponsible for Putnam to publish it without clearly labeling it a fraud. Putnam agreed, and withdrew from the project. Undaunted, Houghton found a financial sponsor, purchased the plates from Putnam’s, and published the work privately under the pseudonym of Peter Beckwith. The book sold poorly, however.
When Small, Maynard published Brasol’s edition, bookstores refused to carry it. Sales were robust by mail order, but Brasol’s hopes of reaching masses of Americans to convince them that communism was an outgrowth of Zionism were dashed, at least temporarily. Resilient in his efforts, Brasol sent a copy of the Protocols to automobile manufacturer Henry Ford, who was convinced that they were authentic. For the next two years, Ford gave the Protocols wide circulation in his newspaper, the Dearborn Independent.
Nothing did more to poison the atmosphere against American Jewry in the years between 1920 and 1922 than Ford’s publication of the Protocols. Apparently at Ford’s urging, the editor of the Dearborn Independent, William Cameron, reworked the Protocols into a series of articles, “The International Jew.” Cameron described the Protocols as “the most comprehensive program for world subjugation that has ever come to public knowledge.” Cameron believed the Protocols probably did not originate with the Basle Congress, but “may have come to them as part of their ancient Jewish inheritance.” The Zionists probably reported to a modern Sanhedrin presided over by a direct descendant of King David. Cameron believed that, at that point, the United States was “very largely in the hands of, or under the influence of, Jewish interests.” Liberalism, jazz and the decline in Christian virtue were all signs, for Cameron, that the Jewish conspiracy was on its way to success. According to the blueprint, Jews would cause more wars, famines and revolutions -- of which the Bolshevik was only the first -- as a means to world domination.
The “International Jew” series stopped running in 1922, but it was widely quoted. It was not until 1927, after a libel suit and Jewish boycott of Ford products that Henry Ford recanted. In a letter to Louis Marshall, Ford claimed not to have paid any “personal attention” to the series. Ford professed to being “deeply mortified” to learn that the Protocols were forgeries and that his newspaper had offended Jewish sensibilities.
Nazi Germany adopted the Protocols as a pretext for its war to exterminate European Jewry. The Protocols still circulate in print and on the Internet, inspiring radical fringe groups in their deranged beliefs in Jewish conspiracies. Sadly, each generation must relearn that the Protocols are one of the grossest and most damaging libels in history.


Evil Bankers SSDD


Thoughts on the Roots of Anti-Semitism in Europe
The beginning of violent European anti-Semitism is often traced to the Crusades at the end of the eleventh century. Others claim it commenced in 1010 with organized mass murders of Jews in France, followed by massacres in areas that are now part of Germany. For almost a thousand years the many versions of religious anti-Semitism have been accompanied by other manifestations of Jew-hatred in political, economic, and cultural spheres.
A close study of the history of anti-Semitism shows that it is first and foremost an expression of political and cultural opposition to Jewish ideals. The earliest known anti-Semitic writings emanated from the ruling class of the Hellenistic empires of the Middle East, specifically the Ptolemaic empire based in Egypt and the Seleucid empire based in Syria.
From that time to the present, anti-Semitism in its most virulent manifestations has been consistently associated with one empire or would-be empire after another.
The ethnic or "racist" variant of political Jew-hatred began in the late 19th century in Germany. At that time the term anti-Semitism first appeared. Fed also by the religious variety, this culminated in the genocide of the Holocaust.
Anti-Semitism is an extreme form of irrational hate, which should not be confused with strong criticism. Jews have been demonized for millennia and defined as the source of all evil. Other recourses to ancient history are often used in Europe to "point to an immutable negative Jewish character. Jews have also been discriminated against in many societies while, simultaneously, having double moral standards applied to them.
Often enough anti-Semites will point to a refusal on the part of Jews to assimilate to national cultures or "identity" in the geographical locales of which Jews have settled and nurtured successful communities. SOURCE: