The People vs. Goldman Sachs - Trial and March!

The People vs. Goldman Sachs - Trial and March! Posted Nov. 3, 2011, 12:08 a.m. est On November 3rd, the People, the 99 percent, will hold A People’s Hearing of Goldman Sachs in Liberty Square Park and march on Goldman Sachs! The people will bring to justice perhaps the single most egregious perpetrator of economic fraud and corruption in the United States. The Hearing will include testimonials from individuals directly affected by Goldman’s fraudulent manipulation of financial markets, including victims of housing foreclosures, pension losses, public lay-offs and untenable student debt. The proceedings will also include expert analysis from Ralph Nader, Cornel West and Chris Hedges. Following the 99-minute hearing the people will decide on a fair and deliverable verdict via our own process of consensus-based direct democracy – and we intend to deliver it ourselves – to the headquarters of Goldman Sachs at 200 West Street, eight blocks from Liberty Square. We will ask for something our judicial and legislative systems have so far failed to deliver – the return of billions of taxpayer dollars to the 99 percent and criminal sentences for those Goldman Sachs executives who carried out the fraud. The event will be broadcast live via the Occupy Wall Street Livestream, among other public media outlets. The People’s Hearing will examine the collapse of regulations and political and economic controls that permitted Goldman Sachs to loot the U.S. Treasury. It will look at how we came to live in a country where it became impossible to vote against the interests of Goldman Sachs. It will ask why Goldman Sachs was allowed to enrich itself not only at the expense of millions of small investors but through its control of the bailouts and the regulatory process. It will demand to know why Goldman Sachs, one of the prime culprits in the destruction of the global economy, is permitted to continue to bankrupt countries such as Greece, creating massive human suffering, without oversight or control. The People’s Hearing will finally give Goldman Sach’s victims a voice. Rolling Stone columnist Matt Taibbi described Goldman Sachs as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money." The broad outlines of Goldman Sachs’ massive fraud are well documented. It put together a collaterized debt obligation (CDO) from mortgage-backed securities that the company assumed would fail. It sold these CDOs as assets and secure investments to pension and mutual funds as well as institutions and banks while betting against them through credit default swaps (CDS). A credit default swap, or CDS, is an insurance policy where the issuer makes up a loss if an asset goes bad. Goldman Sachs, in essence, sold toxic garbage to investors and when this garbage was exposed as garbage, wiping out tens of millions of individual investors who had put away money for retirement or college, Goldman Sachs raked in money from insurers. AIG, which insured these worthless CDOs, lacked sufficient funds to pay Goldman Sachs during the financial meltdown of 2008, a meltdown that evaporated some $ 40 trillion in worldwide wealth. Goldman Sachs, with numerous former officials ensconced in the Treasury department and government, simply looted the U.S. Treasury to pay itself. And they are sitting on our money to this day. The firm has committed numerous acts of fraud that extend beyond our shores. Goldman Sachs was instrumental in helping Greek authorities hide its mounting government budget deficit by selling swaps to the Greek government in return for future revenue streams. The Greek government was able through this arrangement to mask the loan which would have raised its budget deficit above euro zone limits. The sleights of hand now threaten to see Greece go into default and could trigger a massive banking crisis through Europe. The crisis has seen the Greek government unleash draconian austerity measures that are taken out on the backs of students, the poor and the working class. Goldman Sachs is a global criminal syndicate. Goldman Sachs, while its victims suffer from foreclosures and bankruptcy, has set aside $ 10 billion in compensation and bonuses for its chief executives this year. These bonuses are being paid out even as Goldman Sachs dismissed 1,300 employees with another 1,000 employees expected to lose their jobs by the end of the year. No one is safe from our oligarchic elite, not even the underlings at Goldman Sachs. We invite the newly unemployed from Goldman Sachs to join us. The median paycheck in the United States, even while these corporate heads pulled in salaries that often equate to $ 900,000 an hour, fell by 1.2 percent to $ 26,364. The number of poor and unemployed is swelling while the number of Americans making $ 1 million or more climbed to 94,000, a 20 percent increase from 2009. Corporate profits now account for 88 percent of all income growth while wages account for 1 percent. The top one percent has, through fraud and the corporate control of the judiciary and regulatory agencies, accounted for about half of all income growth since the 1970s. How is it possible that in a democracy the bottom 99 percent sees only half of economic growth? How is it possible that the economy does not work on behalf of the 99 percent? How is it possible that financial swindlers and liars continue to run our economy and our government? Its time to bring justice to Goldman Sachs! SOURCE:

Goldman Sachs Tower, at 30 Hudson Street, in Jersey City, New Jersey.

SEC Fraud Suit Against Goldman Is a ‘Buy’ Sign:

April 26 (Bloomberg) -- Now that the Securities and Exchange Commission has unofficially declared Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to be the big bad wolf of the 2007-2009 financial crisis, what should investors do?

See link under "Crisis" for Conspiracy of the Lemmings: Barack Obama and the Radical Left's Strategy of Manufactured Crisis

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-25/sec-fraud-suit-against-goldman-is-a-buy-sign-john-dorfman.html

FYI: During 2008 Goldman Sachs received criticism for an apparent revolving door relationship, in which its employees and consultants have moved in and out of high level U.S. Government positions, creating the potential for conflicts of interest. Former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson was a former CEO of Goldman Sachs. Additional controversy attended the selection of former Goldman Sachs lobbyist Mark Patterson as chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, despite President Barack Obama's campaign promise that he would limit the influence of lobbyists in his administration.

In 2010 Goldman Sachs was criticized for its involvement in the 2010 European sovereign debt crisis. Goldman Sachs between the years 1998-2009 has been reported to systematically help the Greek government to mask its national true debt facts.[66] In September 2009, though, Goldman Sachs among others, created a special Credit Default Swap (CDS) index for the cover of high risk national debt of Greece.[67] This led the interest-rates of Greek national bonds to a very high level, leading the Greek economy very close to bankruptcy in March 2010.

Here in is the hit for anyone who's paying attention. Look to the chart done in 1976
Chart of who "owns" the Federal Reserve
http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html

The tag team of JPMorgan as the monster and Goldman Sachs as its harlot represent a powerful pair that is more responsible for destroying the entire US financial system than 95% of the American public has any awareness. The colossus of JPMorgan is a monster, a predator, nurtured by pond scum. It has gobbled up Chase Manhattan, Manufacturers Hanover, Chemical Bank, Bank One, and more over the past two decades. Their profound presence in keeping the USTreasury Bond yields down can never be understated. They do so by managing 85% of the credit derivatives on the planet. They distorted usury prices, as in price of borrowed money, thus aggravating the LIBOR (London InterBank Offered Rate) market in a very visible manner.

JPMorgan Chase profits jump 55 percent in first quarter of 2010

While numerous financial analysts point to the soaring profits of the big banks as evidence that the economy is strengthening, a look at the numbers suggests something different. Having looted the public treasury with the aid of the Bush and Obama administrations, the banks are returning to profitability through the same parasitic practices which produced the crisis in the first place.

http://wsws.org/articles/2010/apr2010/jpmo-a16.shtml

Goldman Sachs took in $13.4 billion in profits in 2009. The persecuted Mr. Viniar earned $837,365 in 2009, and, on top of that, was handed a $9 million bonus, along with other top executives.

No wonder the idea of an audit of the Privately Owned Federal Reserve is taboo. The patience's are in charge of the asylum.

Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.
http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html

Brought to you by :More DIRTY SECRETS of THE TEMPLE
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=2712

Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 'Silver Certificates' were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the 'powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance'. With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt:

1) war (Viet Nam); and,

2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank. SOURCE:

http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id808.html

Hitler reviews troops-Patricia McAllister Jew Hater Exposed SSDD

Hitler reviews troops in Warsaw, 5 October 1939

Thursday, October 5, 1939 to Thursday, October 20, 2011

72 years and 15 days

864 months

26,313 days

26,313 days can be converted to one of these units:

• 2,273,443,200 seconds
• 37,890,720 minutes
• 631,512 hours
• 3759 weeks
  To this in 2011
  
  

ANY QUESTIONS?

Recently, at an #OWS Bolshevik party, someone asked this Jew hater, Patricia McAllister what her opinion was regarding this country. 

Her reply h/t, Donna:

In this particular interview, she said: “I think that the Zionist Jews that are running these big banks and the Federal reserve, which is not run by the federal government, need to be run out of this country.”

-

So, why do I think she should not have been released? 

-

   In 2010, in my own hometown, there is a radio commentator named Steve Blair. He was fired from his radio job and  his full time job for saying that he did not like the WORD:  diversity.   Just a word, and all of the Communists in town had this mans life turned upside down.  What did he say that was wrong?  Well, he went against the ‘liberal’ Bible of Destroy America when he said he did not like a WORD; Diversity.  This type firing is un Constitutional. 

-

McAllisters ‘release’ is also un Constitutional. The ‘liberal’ bible is not the Constitution, and in my opinion, the people that are against the Constitution are the ones that should be ‘thrown out of the country’, Jew AND Non-Jew.  I cannot be ‘for’ Steve Blair, and against this Jew hater, McAllister.

  What do I think about McAllisters statements?  I believe that McAllister is unbalanced, and totally unfocused. She is brainwashed by the Black Panther/Black power mantra, as well.  It can be seen on her website. 

McAllisters website is here (scroll through):

Get Off Wall Street

-

  “Zionists” are not in control of  Wall Street.   Zionists are usually Christians, way more than Jews.  They believe that Jesus is the cornerstone of Zion.  This is why most Christians are Zionists.  I realize that most people dont  know there is a politicial movement called “Zionism”.    But, most of us are not into the political aspect of this. I am not.  I am only led by scriptures.  The scriptures tell me what Zion is.    I dont care WHO ‘invented’ Zionism.  To me, it is an everlasting thing. I own no stocks in banks, shares, etc. I am not a Crony. I am not the problem.  Anti-Americans are. Like OWS, who ARE the problem. But, that is how brainwashed McAllister is.  And btw: We dont owe McAllister jack sh*t.  she is all about ‘reparations.’   I specifically dont owe her, being my father is a son of the American Revolution and Iroquois/Seneca.

Ms McAllister has a picture on her website:

-

-

This picture depicts a BOLSHEVIK/Communist-Jew fighting for ‘equal rights’ for blacks. (Yes, this is on her website, from a Nazi site)  The character that is depicted is a Communist -Jew (Most of whom do not wear yarmulke’s). 

  A Zionist Jew is usually NOT a Communist.  As well as Zionist-Christians are NOT Communists.  And, frankly, I am tired of being ranked up with people that are destroyers and COMMUNIST Jews play a part in this, sadly.

  So, in my opinion, this Jew hater, McAllister deserved ‘equal time’ from a person who knows the difference, like David Horowitz, who could explain just how bad affirmative action has been for her people. How she is WITH those that she hates. Just like the Nazis have aligned themselves with Communists.  Horowitz is an X-Commie, and that is who should be allowed to debate McAllister.

-Bolshevik/Marxist/Liberal/Progressives (Jews AND Non-Jews) are the ones that are screwing this nation up.  McAllister is WITH them.  So, imo, a person like this should not be released for being stupid.  She should be able to dissent, but equal time and debate should be granted.

http://themadjewess.com/2011/10/19/the-reason-i-dont-agree-with-the-firing-of-jew-hater-patricia-mcallister-lausdunconstitutional/

Ms. McAllister and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,

In Poland... Hitler tours the conquered capital of Warsaw, reviewing the victory parade, before returning to Berlin. Meanwhile, German forces continue mopping up operations against Polish troops still at large between the Vistula and Bug rivers.
In Germany... The Nazi anti-Semitic weekly, Der Sturmer, publishes a "Hymm of Hate" calling England the "curse of the world."
In Moscow... The Soviets continue their moves to strengthen their position in the Baltic by asking the Finnish government for new talks on altering their boundaries. Meanwhile, a Soviet-Latvian Pact is signed, giving the USSR the use of sea and air bases in Latvia. This pact is the second in a series designed to ensure Soviet control of the Baltic.
In the North Atlantic... Eight British and French hunting groups are formed to hunt for the Graf Spee. At this stage the British and the French can afford to divert considerable forces to such a task. Meanwhile, the German pocket battleship Deutschland sinks the SS Stonegate.

Drawing depicting a ritual murder in Der Stürmer

"Whoever had the occasion to be an eye-witness during the slaughtering of animals or to see at least a truthful film on the slaughtering-will never forget this horrible experience. It is atrocious. And unwillingly, he is reminded of the crimes which the Jews have committed for centuries on men. He will be reminded of the ritual murder.

History points out hundreds of cases in which non-Jewish children were tortured to death. They also were given the same incision through the throat as is found on slaughtered animals. They also were slowly bled to death while fully conscious"

Der Stürmer, July 1938

Over time Der Stürmer's circulation grew and it was distributed to any country with a large German population, including: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, and the United States, among others.

Typical anti-Semitic cartoon from Der Stürmer

But by 1938 the rhetoric began to change. Rather than the usual rants against the evils of the Jews, the paper began to call for the annihilation of the Jewish race. Between 1938 and 1941 the Nuremberg trials proved that twenty-three individual articles were printed in Der Stürmer where the key focus was the urging of the physical destruction of Jews as a vermin and pestilence.

One article from May, 1939 stated:

"A punitive expedition must come against the Jews in Russia. A punitive expedition which will provide the same fate for them that every murderer and criminal must expect. Death sentence and execution. The Jews in Russia must be killed. They must be exterminated root and branch."

As the war progressed successfully on both fronts, Streicher stepped up his efforts to incite anti-Jewish hatred through his speeches and his writings. Over the next few years between August, 1941 and September, 1944, he personally authored 12 articles demanding the annihilation and extermination of the Jewish race in unequivocal terms.

Der Stürmer cover "Jews as instigators"

One article written personally by Streicher dated 25th December, 1941 stated:

"If the danger of the reproduction of that curse of God in the Jewish blood is to finally come to an end, then there is only one way-the extermination of that people whose father is the devil."

On March 19, 1942 he also stated:

"There were two ways which might have led to a liberation of Europe from the Jews: Expulsion or extermination! Both methods have been tried in the course of the centuries, but they were never carried to a conclusion.... The teaching of Christianity has stood in the way of a radical solution of the Jewish problem in Europe...

Fate has decreed that it was finally left to the 20th century to see the total solution of the Jewish problem. Just how this solution will be achieved has been made known to the European nations and to entire non-Jewish humanity in a proclamation read out by the Führer of the German people on the 24th February 1942."

(quoting Adolf Hitler):

The Protocols Come to America

At the turn of the century, the Russian Czar’s secret police forged a document, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which purported to outline a plan for Jewish world domination. The Russians claimed that the radical Jewish intelligentsia gathered in 1897 at the First Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland wrote the Protocols. The document “showed” how a Jewish cabal was fomenting terror, causing famine and promoting war. Publication of the Protocols sparked anti-Jewish pogroms in Kiev and Kishineff.

While the Protocols were whispered about in anti-Semitic circles in the United States, they did not reach American shores in English translation until 1917. A Russian monarchist émigré, Boris Brasol, translated the Protocols into English and passed a copy to the State Department, hoping to persuade the United States government to withhold recognition of the Soviet regime. He was convinced that the Bolsheviks were in the pay of American Jewish bankers of German background -- Jacob Schiff and Felix Warburg in particular – who had financed the Czar's overthrow to advance German interests in World War I.

An American Army Intelligence officer in Brooklyn, Harris Ayres Houghton, MD, obtained Brasol’s translation of the Protocols and became convinced of their authenticity. An ardent anti-Semite and anticommunist, Houghton had the authority to act on his fantasies. According to historian Robert Singerman, writing in the journal of the American Jewish Historical Society,* Houghton “ordered one of his subordinates ‘to investigate any Jew as long as he was prominent’” for signs of subversion. In 1918, Houghton passed a copy of the Protocols to Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, chair of a government committee investigating a scandal in American wartime aircraft manufacture. Houghton was certain that “Jewish International Bankers” had caused the manufacturing problems, but Justice Hughes scoffed at the idea and denied the authenticity of the Protocols.

At first, the American Jewish community made no formal response to the typescript versions of the Protocols in circulation. They believed it best not to give them publicity. In 1920, however, a version was published in England and both Brasol and Houghton planned to bring out annotated versions in the United States. Brasol found a respectable company named Small, Maynard to publish his version. Putnam and Son publishers agreed to publish Houghton’s.

When the American Jewish Committee learned of Putnam’s plans, its president, Louis Marshall, contacted General George H. Putnam directly to discuss the publication project. Putnam defended it on the grounds of free speech, but Marshall countered that free speech is only protected if its is not libelous. Since there was ample proof that the Protocols were forgeries written to stir up violence against Jews, it would be irresponsible for Putnam to publish it without clearly labeling it a fraud. Putnam agreed, and withdrew from the project. Undaunted, Houghton found a financial sponsor, purchased the plates from Putnam’s, and published the work privately under the pseudonym of Peter Beckwith. The book sold poorly, however.

When Small, Maynard published Brasol’s edition, bookstores refused to carry it. Sales were robust by mail order, but Brasol’s hopes of reaching masses of Americans to convince them that communism was an outgrowth of Zionism were dashed, at least temporarily. Resilient in his efforts, Brasol sent a copy of the Protocols to automobile manufacturer Henry Ford, who was convinced that they were authentic. For the next two years, Ford gave the Protocols wide circulation in his newspaper, the Dearborn Independent.

Nothing did more to poison the atmosphere against American Jewry in the years between 1920 and 1922 than Ford’s publication of the Protocols. Apparently at Ford’s urging, the editor of the Dearborn Independent, William Cameron, reworked the Protocols into a series of articles, “The International Jew.” Cameron described the Protocols as “the most comprehensive program for world subjugation that has ever come to public knowledge.” Cameron believed the Protocols probably did not originate with the Basle Congress, but “may have come to them as part of their ancient Jewish inheritance.” The Zionists probably reported to a modern Sanhedrin presided over by a direct descendant of King David. Cameron believed that, at that point, the United States was “very largely in the hands of, or under the influence of, Jewish interests.” Liberalism, jazz and the decline in Christian virtue were all signs, for Cameron, that the Jewish conspiracy was on its way to success. According to the blueprint, Jews would cause more wars, famines and revolutions -- of which the Bolshevik was only the first -- as a means to world domination.

The “International Jew” series stopped running in 1922, but it was widely quoted. It was not until 1927, after a libel suit and Jewish boycott of Ford products that Henry Ford recanted. In a letter to Louis Marshall, Ford claimed not to have paid any “personal attention” to the series. Ford professed to being “deeply mortified” to learn that the Protocols were forgeries and that his newspaper had offended Jewish sensibilities.

Nazi Germany adopted the Protocols as a pretext for its war to exterminate European Jewry. The Protocols still circulate in print and on the Internet, inspiring radical fringe groups in their deranged beliefs in Jewish conspiracies. Sadly, each generation must relearn that the Protocols are one of the grossest and most damaging libels in history.

Evil Bankers SSDD

Thoughts on the Roots of Anti-Semitism in Europe

Ancient Menorah

The beginning of violent European anti-Semitism is often traced to the Crusades at the end of the eleventh century. Others claim it commenced in 1010 with organized mass murders of Jews in France, followed by massacres in areas that are now part of Germany. For almost a thousand years the many versions of religious anti-Semitism have been accompanied by other manifestations of Jew-hatred in political, economic, and cultural spheres.

A close study of the history of anti-Semitism shows that it is first and foremost an expression of political and cultural opposition to Jewish ideals. The earliest known anti-Semitic writings emanated from the ruling class of the Hellenistic empires of the Middle East, specifically the Ptolemaic empire based in Egypt and the Seleucid empire based in Syria.

From that time to the present, anti-Semitism in its most virulent manifestations has been consistently associated with one empire or would-be empire after another.

The ethnic or "racist" variant of political Jew-hatred began in the late 19th century in Germany. At that time the term anti-Semitism first appeared. Fed also by the religious variety, this culminated in the genocide of the Holocaust.

Anti-Semitism is an extreme form of irrational hate, which should not be confused with strong criticism. Jews have been demonized for millennia and defined as the source of all evil. Other recourses to ancient history are often used in Europe to "point to an immutable negative Jewish character. Jews have also been discriminated against in many societies while, simultaneously, having double moral standards applied to them.

Often enough anti-Semites will point to a refusal on the part of Jews to assimilate to national cultures or "identity" in the geographical locales of which Jews have settled and nurtured successful communities. SOURCE: