Showing posts with label control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label control. Show all posts

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Sandra Fluke Exposed As Fraud, Activist, Possible White House Operative



Sandra Fluke Exposed As Fraud, Activist, Possible White House Operative
Sandra Fluke is no Slut, but she is prostituting for the Democratic National Committee
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.
Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.
While she is described as a “third year law student” they always fail to mention that she is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.
Does your campus’s LSRJ chapter face opposition in regard to facilitating a comprehensive conversation about reproductive justice? Well mine definitely does! While my campus has a mix of people with different backgrounds, and a rich liberal arts community, the Midwest doesn’t exactly scream bleeding liberal. Some LSRJ chapters at conservative campuses face opposition in the form of other, more conservative, student run organizations; some face it from their administrations, and others from their peers, or the community in general. Whatever the opposition is, it can be incredibly frustrating and disheartening.
The question is, how do we combat this conservative opposition and oppression, in order to facilitate a discussion and educate others about the RJ movement? I am obviously not alone in facing these problems, as Sandra Fluke of Georgetown lead a packed room in a discussion on this question at the first Issue Caucus that I attended at the Leadership Institute, LSRJ’s national conference at Berkeley.
While no solution was definitively reached, and I personally don’t begin to have the “right” answer, I was really charged by the discussion and feel many great ideas were presented. Some campus chapters decided to take an adversarial approach, feeling it important to use those “scary” words the opposition fears.
Further background research on Ms Fluke reveals that she got her start in government in New York in 2009.

Sandra Fluke’s professional background in domestic violence and human trafficking began with Sanctuary for Families in New York City. There, she launched the agency’s pilot Program Evaluation Initiative. While at Sanctuary, she co-founded the New York Statewide Coalition for Fair Access to Family Court, which after a twenty-year stalemate, successfully advocated for legislation granting access to civil orders of protection for unmarried victims of domestic violence, including LGBTQ victims and teens. Sandra was also a member of the Manhattan Borough President’s Taskforce on Domestic Violence and numerous other New York City and New York State coalitions that successfully advocated for policy improvements impacting victims of domestic violence.
As the 2010 recipient of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Fran Kandel Public Interest Grant, she researched, wrote, and produced an instructional film on how to apply for a domestic violence restraining order in pro per. She has also interned with the Coalition to Abolish Slavery & Trafficking; Polaris Project; Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County; Break the Cycle; the Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project; NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund; Crime Victim and Sexual Assault Services; and the Human Services Coalition of Tompkins County.
Through Georgetown’s clinic programs, Sandra has proposed legislation based on fact-finding in Kenya regarding child trafficking for domestic work, and has represented victims of domestic violence in protection order cases. Sandra is the Development Editor of the Journal of Gender and the Law, andserved as the President of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, and the Vice President of the Women’s Legal Alliance. In her first year, she also co-founded a campus committee addressing human trafficking. Cornell University awarded her a B. S. in Policy Analysis & Management, as well as Feminist, Gender, & Sexuality Studies in 2003.
Obama Calls Sandra Fluke, to tell her Job well done
Yeah, I know.  Snerdley, I told you, “This is gonna be bigger than the phony soldiers,” and he didn’t think it was.  I said, “Oh, it’s gonna be ten times bigger.  This is gonna be ten times bigger than the phony soldiers, ten times bigger than the Michael J. Fox thing, ’cause the Democrats are desperate.”  The Democrats are desperate, and I don’t know why they want people… Well, I do know why they want people to fear me.  This is all they’ve got, is to go out and try to discredit their critics, to impugn and discredit the people who disagree with them. Because there’s no way, if we actually sat down and had a debate about this proposition, anybody on the left can win this.  Not in a sane world where there is common sense.
Apparently Sandra Fluke told Obama something. When he asked her if she’s okay, she said that Obama told her that she should tell her parents they should be proud. (pause) Okay, I’m button my lip on that one.  The president tells Sandra Fluke (chuckling), 30-year-old Sandra Fluke, that her parents should be proud.  Okay.  Let me ask you a question.  I might be surprised at the answer I would get to this question.  Your daughter appears before a congressional committee and says she’s having so much sex, she can’t pay for it and wants a new welfare program to pay for it. Would you be proud?  I don’t know about you, but I’d be embarrassed.  I’d disconnect the phone. I’d go into hiding and hope the media didn’t find me.  See, everybody forgets what starts this, or what started this whole thing. Or maybe they don’t! Maybe that’s normal behavior on the left now, for all I know.
But it’s one thing for Obama to call and ask her if she’s okay.
I’m waiting for Bill Clinton to call her.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH:  Have I denied Sandra Fluke her birth control pills?
“No, but you would.”
No I wouldn’t.  I wouldn’t deny her her birth control pills.  That’s not what this is about. This isn’t about birth control pills, anyway, folks.  This isn’t about contraception anyway.  This is about expanding the reach and power of government into your womb, if you’re a woman.  This is about the Democrat Party wanting more and more control over you.  What was early feminism all about?  Emancipation, individuality, freedom, liberation, all of these things. Now here comes Danica Patrick out and she says, “I’m perfectly comfortable letting the government make my health decisions for me.”  Well, folks, I’m gonna tell you: Right there, that’s the death and the end of feminism. source:

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Reid blocks effort to repeal birth control rule: "sorry Catholic freedom of religion does not apply to you"




Roy 'the Bluntinator' Blunt: “I will be back,” Blunt said


Reid blocks effort to repeal birth control rule, tells opponents to "calm down"
by Audrey Hudson

“(Democrats) won’t allow those of us who were sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution to even offer an amendment that says we believe in our First Amendment right to religious freedom. I never thought I’d see the day,” McConnell responded.

Senate Republicans on Thursday were blocked from offering legislation to repeal the Obama administration’s rule requiring religious organizations to provide free birth control through insurance coverage.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) called the lawmakers’ efforts “senseless” and said they needed to “calm down” and wait until the controversial regulation is finalized before trying to stop it.

Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) tried to add an amendment that has bipartisan support to a transportation bill being debated on the floor, but Reid blocked the maneuver because he said the language was not germane to the legislation.

“I appreciate that the Republicans take every opportunity… to mess up a good piece of legislation,” Reid said.

“The rule hasn't even been finalized yet. Let's at least wait until there is a final rule. Everybody should calm down, let see what transpires,” Reid said.

“I’ve never seen anything like this before,” Reid said.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell agreed that he had never seen anything like this before, but for a different reason.

“(Democrats) won’t allow those of us who were sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution to even offer an amendment that says we believe in our First Amendment right to religious freedom. I never thought I’d see the day,” McConnell responded.

“I’ve spent a lot of time in my life defending the First Amendment. But I never thought I’d see the day when the elected representatives of the people of this country would be blocked by a majority party in Congress to even express their support for it.”

Speaking to the Conservative Political Action Committee conference in Washington earlier in the day, McConnell vowed to “fight this attack on the fundamental right to religious freedom until the courts overturn it or we’ve got a president who will reverse it.”

The floor skirmish came as two key Democratic Senators publicly broke with the president to publicly oppose the rule, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts and Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida.

The White House said they would give religious institutions a year to comply with the rule, which Blunt said makes their actions “even more offensive.”

“The idea that you could change your religious beliefs in a year, or a lifetime, because some federal regulator says you need to, is unbelievably offensive in our country based on the principles that we hold most dear in the Constitution itself,” Blunt said.

Blunt said he was disappointed the Democratic leader blocked his amendment, but said this won’t be last time Republicans will try and move legislation on the floor to reverse the decision.

“I will be back,” Blunt said
source:
_________________________________________________________________



Barack Hussein Obama II: Look at them, bloody Catholics, filling the bloody world up with bloody people they can't afford to bloody feed.

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: What are we dear? 

Barack Hussein Obama II: Protestant, and fiercely proud of it.

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: Hmm. Well, why do they have so many children?

Barack Hussein Obama II: Because... every time they have sexual intercourse, they have to have a baby.

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: But it's the same with us, Barack . 

Barack Hussein Obama II: What do you mean?

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: Well, I mean, we've got two children, and we've had sexual intercourse twice. 

Barack Hussein Obama II: That's not the point. We could have it any time we wanted. 
Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: Really?

Barack Hussein Obama II: Oh, yes, and, what's more, because we don't believe in all that Papist claptrap, we can take precautions.

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: What, you mean... lock the door?

Barack Hussein Obama II: No, no. I mean, because we are members of the Protestant Reformed Church, which successfully challenged the autocratic power of the Papacy in the mid-sixteenth century, we can wear little rubber devices to prevent issue
. 
Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: What d'you mean?

Barack Hussein Obama II: I could, if I wanted, have sexual intercourse with you... 

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: Oh, yes, Barack .

Barack Hussein Obama II: ...and, by wearing a rubber sheath over my old feller, I could insure... that, when I came off, you would not be impregnated. 

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: Ooh.

Barack Hussein Obama II: That's what being a Protestant's all about. That's why it's the church for me. That's why it's the church for anyone who respects the individual and the individual's right to decide for him or herself. When Martin Luther nailed his protest up to the church door in fifteen-seventeen, he may not have realised the full significance of what he was doing, but four hundred years later, thanks to him, my dear, I can wear whatever I want on my John Thomas... 
[sniff] 

Barack Hussein Obama II: ... and, Protestantism doesn't stop at the simple condom. Oh, no. I can wear French Ticklers if I want. 

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: You what? 

Barack Hussein Obama II: French Ticklers. Black Mambos. Crocodile Ribs. Sheaths that are designed not only to protect, but also to enhance the stimulation of sexual congress. 

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: Have you got one? 

Barack Hussein Obama II: Have I got one? Uh, well, no, but I can go down the road any time I want and walk into Barack 's and hold my head up high and say in a loud, steady voice, 'Barack , I want you to sell me a condom. In fact, today, I think I'll have a French Tickler, for I am a Protestant.' 

Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama: Well, why don't you?

Barack Hussein Obama II: But they - Well, they cannot, 'cause their church never made the great leap out of the Middle Ages and the domination of alien Episcopal supremacy